Sealey v. State
Opinion
Lucius SEALEY, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jack O. Johnson, Public Defender, and P. Douglas Brinkmeyer, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael J. Kotler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. We agree with the decisions of the First, Third, and Fourth District Courts of Appeal that Section 810.011(1), *431 Florida Statutes, extends the application of curtilage to the area surrounding any building, not just a dwelling, for purposes of defining a burglary. Tobler v. State, 371 So.2d 1043 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); DeGeorge v. State, 358 So.2d 217 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Greer v. State, 354 So.2d 952 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978).
GRIMES, C.J., and SCHEB and OTT, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
379 So. 2d 430 (Sealey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.