Sealed v. Sealed

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sealed v. Sealed. Read the opinion of the Court — 829 F.3d 379
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 12, 2018·No. 18-50092·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 18-50092 FILED Conference Calendar October 12, 2018 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk SEALED APPELLEE,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

SEALED APPELLANT,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:13-CR-451-2

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent the appellant in this appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). The appellant has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 18-50092

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sealed v. Sealed, (5th Cir. 2018).

Sealed v. Sealed (Sealed v. Sealed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)