Sealed v. Sealed

Fifth Circuit

Sealed v. Sealed

256 F. App'x 688

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sealed v. Sealed. Read the opinion of the Court — 394 F.3d 338 →

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 4, 2007·No. 07-10881·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reason that there was no abuse of discretion by that court, and we could not say under this record that this court should order discovery pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782, before the German court has ruled on the same discovery request.

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

The judgment of the district court is affirmed for the reason that there was no abuse of discretion by that court, and we could not say under this record that this court should order discovery pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782, before the German court has ruled on the same discovery request.

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Sealed v. Sealed, 256 F. App'x 688 (5th Cir. 2007).

Pincite

256 F. App'x 688 (Sealed v. Sealed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related