Seal v. RAW

Missouri Court of Appeals

Seal v. RAW

229 S.W.3d 651, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1095, 2007 WL 2238180

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 7, 2007

DocketWD 66961

StatusPublished

This text of 229 S.W.3d 651 (Seal v. RAW) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seal v. RAW, 229 S.W.3d 651, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1095, 2007 WL 2238180 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Deborah Jo Seal (“Seal”) appeals the denial of her motion to modify a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (“QDRO”) entered following her divorce from Ronald Keith Raw (“Raw”). Having reviewed the record on appeal, we conclude that the trial court’s denial of that motion is supported by substantial evidence, and affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Deborah Jo Seal (“Seal”) appeals the denial of her motion to modify a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (“QDRO”) entered following her divorce from Ronald Keith Raw (“Raw”). Having reviewed the record on appeal, we conclude that the trial court’s denial of that motion is supported by substantial evidence, and affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal written opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

229 S.W.3d 651, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1095, 2007 WL 2238180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seal-v-raw-moctapp-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack