SeAH Steel Corp. v. United States

2011 CIT 62
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in SeAH Steel Corp. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 704 F. Supp. 2d 1353
United States Court of International Trade·Decided May 26, 2011·No. 1:97-s-00002·Published

Opinion

Slip Op. 11-62

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

SEAH STEEL CORPORATION,

Plaintiff, Before: Gregory W. Carman, Judge v. Court No. 09-00248 UNITED STATES,

Defendant,

and

BRISTOL METALS,

Defendant-Intervenor.

JUDGMENT

Upon consideration of Department of Commerce’s Second Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Remand (ECF No. 90), upon comments in which all parties concur with affirmance of that remand determination (ECF Nos. 93, 97, and 98), upon all other pertinent papers, and pursuant to USCIT R. 54, it is hereby

ORDERED that judgment is entered sustaining the Second Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Remand; and it is further

ORDERED that this case is dismissed.

/s/Gregory W. Carman Gregory W. Carman, Judge

Dated: May 26, 2011 New York, NY

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SeAH Steel Corp. v. United States, 2011 CIT 62 (cit 2011).

2011 CIT 62 (SeAH Steel Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.