Seaford v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Seaford v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

106 Ohio St. 3d 430

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 26, 2005

DocketNo. 2005-0172

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 106 Ohio St. 3d 430 (Seaford v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seaford v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co., 106 Ohio St. 3d 430 (Ohio 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals on the issue raised in appellant’s Proposition of Law No. IV is reversed on the authority of Hess v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., 106 Ohio St.3d 389, 2005-Ohio-5408, 835 N.E.2d 679, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for application of Hess.

Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Lanzinger, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals on the issue raised in appellant’s Proposition of Law No. IV is reversed on the authority of Hess v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., 106 Ohio St.3d 389, 2005-Ohio-5408, 835 N.E.2d 679, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for application of Hess.

Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Lanzinger, J., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 Ohio St. 3d 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seaford-v-norfolk-southern-railway-co-ohio-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack