Seaford v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Seaford v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.

106 Ohio St. 3d 430

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 26, 2005·No. No. 2005-0172·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals on the issue raised in appellant’s Proposition of Law No. IV is reversed on the authority of Hess v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., 106 Ohio St.3d 389, 2005-Ohio-5408, 835 N.E.2d 679, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for application of Hess.

Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Lanzinger, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals on the issue raised in appellant’s Proposition of Law No. IV is reversed on the authority of Hess v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., 106 Ohio St.3d 389, 2005-Ohio-5408, 835 N.E.2d 679, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for application of Hess.

Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Lanzinger, J., dissent.

Seaford v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co., 106 Ohio St. 3d 430 (Ohio 2005).

Pincite

106 Ohio St. 3d 430 (Seaford v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related