Seafire, Inc. v. Ackerson
This text of 98 N.E.2d 478 (Seafire, Inc. v. Ackerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
[670]*670Concur: Loughran Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Dye and Froessel, JJ.; Desmond and Fuld, JJ., dissent in part and vote to modify the judgment appealed from and to grant judgment in favor of defendants dismissing the third and fourth alleged causes of action, on the ground that the failures of the taxing authorities to comply with statutory requirements in connection with the 1940-41 taxes were not jurisdictional defects rendering the sale for those taxes void, since plaintiff duly and personally received a bill from the collector for the 1940-41 taxes, paid half thereof and admittedly failed to pay the other half not by reason of lack of any notice or knowledge but because of its own inadvertence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
98 N.E.2d 478, 302 N.Y. 668, 1951 N.Y. LEXIS 840, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seafire-inc-v-ackerson-ny-1951.