Seacrest Farms, Inc. v. Noyes

164 Misc. 369, 299 N.Y.S. 812, 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1874
New York Supreme Court·Decided September 27, 1937·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Schirick, J.

This is an application for a certiorari order to review a determination of the Commissioner of Agriculture and Markets denying the petitioner’s application for a milk license.

The respondent has appeared specially and raised the objection that this petition cannot be entertained because the proceeding was not commenced within the thirty-day period provided for in section 258-d of the Agriculture and Markets Law, as amended by chapter 409 of the Laws of 1937.

[370] This objection must be sustained. Assuming that the thirty-day period commenced to run on the day when the petitioner received notice of the denial of his application, on July seventeenth, the time to institute review proceedings expired on August sixteenth. On that date the order to show cause with which'this application was commenced was not even signed. Certainly, the mere preparation of a petition, unaccompanied by any official action or notice to the respondent, cannot be considered the institution of a proceeding to review by certiorari.

The application is denied, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seacrest Farms, Inc. v. Noyes, 164 Misc. 369, 299 N.Y.S. 812, 1937 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1874 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1937).

164 Misc. 369 (Seacrest Farms, Inc. v. Noyes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Westbrook Farms, Inc. v. Day
83 Misc. 2d 1072 (New York Supreme Court, 1975)