Seacord v. Burling
1 How. Pr. 175
This text of 1 How. Pr. 175 (Seacord v. Burling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Seacord v. Burling, 1 How. Pr. 175 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).
Opinion
The objection to the juror’s age, if taken in time would have been a good one, but after he was drawn upon the panel— heard the cause tried, and had with the rest rendered a verdict, it is too late to interpose the objection. The motion must be denied.
Decision.—Motion denied, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People v. Thayer
132 A.D. 593 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
People v. Thayer
61 Misc. 573 (New York County Courts, 1908)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seacord-v-burling-nysupct-1845.