Seacord v. Burling
1 How. Pr. 175
Opinion
The objection to the juror’s age, if taken in time would have been a good one, but after he was drawn upon the panel— heard the cause tried, and had with the rest rendered a verdict, it is too late to interpose the objection. The motion must be denied.
Decision.—Motion denied, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Seacord v. Burling, 1 How. Pr. 175 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).
1 How. Pr. 175 (Seacord v. Burling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Thayer
132 A.D. 593 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
People v. Thayer
61 Misc. 573 (New York County Courts, 1908)