Seacat Marine Drilling Co. v. Babineaux

382 U.S. 16, 86 S. Ct. 67, 15 L. Ed. 2d 12, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 528
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 11, 1965·No. 283·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Harlan is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seacat Marine Drilling Co. v. Babineaux, 382 U.S. 16, 86 S. Ct. 67, 15 L. Ed. 2d 12, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 528 (1965).

382 U.S. 16 (Seacat Marine Drilling Co. v. Babineaux) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jackson v. AMERICAN MUT. LIABILITY INS.
584 So. 2d 348 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1991)
Geiger v. State, Department of Institutions
242 So. 2d 606 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1970)
Bergeron v. Sabine Dredging & Construction Co.
281 F. Supp. 223 (W.D. Louisiana, 1968)
Morrison v. New Hampshire Insurance Company
187 So. 2d 729 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1966)
Berry v. State Tax Commission
382 U.S. 16 (Supreme Court, 1965)