Seabrooks v. City of Macon

86 S.E. 781, 17 Ga. App. 348, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 415
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 5, 1915·No. 6912·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Wade, J.

1. Where one is charged with the violation of a valid municipal ordinance prohibiting the keeping of intoxicating liquors for the purpose of illegal sale, proof of one sale is sufficient to authorize a conviction. Rice v. Eatonton, 15 Ga. App. 505 (83 S. E. 868); Sawyer [349]*349v. Blakely, 2 Ga. App. 159 (58 S. E. 399); Coggins v. Griffin, 5 Ga. App. 1 (62 S. E. 659); Cooper v. Port Valley, 13 Ga. App. 169 (78 S. E. 1097); Rooney v. Augusta, 117 Ga. 709 (45 S. E. 72); Robinson v. Americus, 121 Ga. 180-182 (48 S. E. 924).

Decided November 5, 1915. Certiorari; from Bibb superior court — -Judge Mathews. July 30, 1915. A. T. Walden, for plaintiff in error. Walter Defore, B. G. Plunlcett, contra.

2. No error of law is complained of, and the evidence supports the verdict.

■Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seabrooks v. City of Macon, 86 S.E. 781, 17 Ga. App. 348, 1915 Ga. App. LEXIS 415 (Ga. Ct. App. 1915).

86 S.E. 781 (Seabrooks v. City of Macon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jefferson v. City of Perry
90 S.E. 365 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)