Seabrooks v. City of Macon
Opinion
1. Where one is charged with the violation of a valid municipal ordinance prohibiting the keeping of intoxicating liquors for the purpose of illegal sale, proof of one sale is sufficient to authorize a conviction. Rice v. Eatonton, 15 Ga. App. 505 (83 S. E. 868); Sawyer [349]*349v. Blakely, 2 Ga. App. 159 (58 S. E. 399); Coggins v. Griffin, 5 Ga. App. 1 (62 S. E. 659); Cooper v. Port Valley, 13 Ga. App. 169 (78 S. E. 1097); Rooney v. Augusta, 117 Ga. 709 (45 S. E. 72); Robinson v. Americus, 121 Ga. 180-182 (48 S. E. 924).
2. No error of law is complained of, and the evidence supports the verdict.
■Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
86 S.E. 781 (Seabrooks v. City of Macon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.