Seabrook v. State

608 So. 2d 560, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12256, 1992 WL 341995
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 18, 1992·No. No. 91-939·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was sentenced as an habitual felony offender. We affirm. However, as we did in Hodges v. State, 596 So.2d 481 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992), we certify the following question to the supreme court as one of great public importance:

DOES SECTION 775.084, FLORIDA STATUTES (1989), DENY EITHER DUE PROCESS OR EQUAL PROTECTION OF LAW UNDER EITHER THE FLORIDA OR THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION; OR VIOLATE THE DOCTRINE OF SEPARATION OF POWERS, AS SET FORTH IN THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?
SMITH, WIGGINTON and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seabrook v. State, 608 So. 2d 560, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 12256, 1992 WL 341995 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

608 So. 2d 560 (Seabrook v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. State
635 So. 2d 994 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Seabrook v. State
629 So. 2d 129 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
London v. State
623 So. 2d 527 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)