Seabrook v. Block

Supreme Court of Florida

Seabrook v. Block

15 So. 2d 60, 153 Fla. 535

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 1, 1943·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We think that the only real question presented on the appeal is whether the verdict is so excessive as to warrant reversal of the judgment by this Court. In our opinion the evidence supports a finding of liability; and we are unable to say that the verdict is so manifestly excessive as to justify reversal, or to require a remittitur.

The judgment is affirmed.

BUFORD; C. J., BROWN, THOMAS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We think that the only real question presented on the appeal is whether the verdict is so excessive as to warrant reversal of the judgment by this Court. In our opinion the evidence supports a finding of liability; and we are unable to say that the verdict is so manifestly excessive as to justify reversal, or to require a remittitur.

The judgment is affirmed.

BUFORD; C. J., BROWN, THOMAS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.

Seabrook v. Block, 15 So. 2d 60, 153 Fla. 535 (Fla. 1943).

Pincite

15 So. 2d 60 (Seabrook v. Block) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related