Seabrook v. Appellate Division of Supreme Court

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Seabrook v. Appellate Division of Supreme Court

44 A.D.2d 867, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5017

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 44 A.D.2d 867 (Seabrook v. Appellate Division of Supreme Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seabrook v. Appellate Division of Supreme Court, 44 A.D.2d 867, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5017 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding under CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Appellate Division, First Department, entered March 25, 1974) to annul respondents’ determination dismissing petitioner as a Uniformed Court Officer in the Criminal Court of the City of New York. In view of the issues raised in the petition, the proceeding shall be deemed to have been transferred to this court pursuant to CPLR 7804 (subd. [g]). Respondents’ motion to dismiss the proceeding on the ground petitioner has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies denied, without costs and without prejudice to renewal of the contention as an objection in point of law set forth in the answer (CPLR 7804, subd. [f]). Respondents’ answer and return shall be filed in this court within 20 days of the date of the order to be entered hereon. Staley, Jr., J. P.,

Greenblott, Cooke, Sweeney and Kane, JJ., concur

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding under CPLR article 78 (transferred to this court by order of the Appellate Division, First Department, entered March 25, 1974) to annul respondents’ determination dismissing petitioner as a Uniformed Court Officer in the Criminal Court of the City of New York. In view of the issues raised in the petition, the proceeding shall be deemed to have been transferred to this court pursuant to CPLR 7804 (subd. [g]). Respondents’ motion to dismiss the proceeding on the ground petitioner has failed to exhaust his administrative remedies denied, without costs and without prejudice to renewal of the contention as an objection in point of law set forth in the answer (CPLR 7804, subd. [f]). Respondents’ answer and return shall be filed in this court within 20 days of the date of the order to be entered hereon. Staley, Jr., J. P.,

Greenblott, Cooke, Sweeney and Kane, JJ., concur

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

44 A.D.2d 867, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seabrook-v-appellate-division-of-supreme-court-nyappdiv-1974.