Seabright v. De Pansza

Court of Appeals of Texas

Seabright v. De Pansza

59 S.W.2d 1119, 1933 Tex. App. LEXIS 662

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 19, 1933

DocketNo. 9056

StatusPublished

This text of 59 S.W.2d 1119 (Seabright v. De Pansza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seabright v. De Pansza, 59 S.W.2d 1119, 1933 Tex. App. LEXIS 662 (Tex. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

MURRAY, Justice.

We will designate the parties as they were designated in the court below.

Adolph Seabright instituted this suit against defendants upon an alleged note and to foreclose a chattel mortgage.

We do not find an objection reserved either in the statement of facts or by formal bill of exception other than exception taken to the action of the trial court in overruling motion for a new trial. There was no objection made or exception taken to the court’s charge. There are no proper assignments of error in the record.

The cause was tried before a jury, who, upon sufficient evidence, resolved all issues of fact against the plaintiff and in favor of the defendants.’

There being no fundamental error disclosed by the record, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI