Seaborn Enterprise 2, LLC v. United Gaming L.L.C.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 23, 2024
DocketA24D0203
StatusPublished

This text of Seaborn Enterprise 2, LLC v. United Gaming L.L.C. (Seaborn Enterprise 2, LLC v. United Gaming L.L.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seaborn Enterprise 2, LLC v. United Gaming L.L.C., (Ga. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ January 23, 2024

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24D0203. SEABORN ENTERPRISE 2, LLC v. UNITED GAMING LLC.

Seaborn Enterprise 2, LLC, filed this timely application for discretionary review, seeking to appeal a superior court order dismissing Seaborn’s petition for review of a Georgia Lottery Corporation (“GLC”) decision and affirming the GLC’s judgment. Under OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1) & (b), “[a]ppeals from decisions of the superior courts reviewing decisions of the State Board of Workers’ Compensation, the State Board of Education, auditors, state and local administrative agencies, and lower courts by certiorari or de novo proceedings” must be initiated by filing an application for discretionary review. But the statute creating the GLC expressly provides that it is “not a state agency.” OCGA § 50-27-4. A superior court order reviewing a GLC decision therefore “does not fall within the ambit of OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1),” and an application for discretionary review thus is not required here. Amusement Leasing v. Ga. Lottery Corp., 352 Ga. App. 243, 246 (1) (834 SE2d 330) (2019). Under OCGA § 5-6-35 (j), this Court will grant a timely application for discretionary review if the lower court’s order is subject to direct appeal. See City of Rincon v. Couch, 272 Ga. App. 411, 412 (612 SE2d 596) (2005). Accordingly, this application is hereby GRANTED. Seaborn shall have ten days from the date of this order to file a notice of appeal in the superior court. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (g). If Seaborn already has filed a notice of appeal in the superior court, then it need not file a second notice. The clerk of the superior court is DIRECTED to include a copy of this order in the record transmitted to the Court of Appeals.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 01/23/2024 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Rincon v. Couch
612 S.E.2d 596 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Seaborn Enterprise 2, LLC v. United Gaming L.L.C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seaborn-enterprise-2-llc-v-united-gaming-llc-gactapp-2024.