Seabolt v. State
This text of 378 S.E.2d 416 (Seabolt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant, Jerome Seabolt, was convicted of obstruction of a law enforcement officer, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, and possessing marijuana in violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act. On appeal, his sole contention is that his appointed trial counsel provided ineffective assistance. Seabolt’s trial counsel filed a motion for new trial asserting only the general grounds before he was replaced by Seabolt’s appellate counsel. Appellate counsel filed no amended motion for new trial, but asserted ineffective assistance of trial counsel for the first time on appeal. Under these circumstances, this case must be remanded to the trial court for a hearing and appropriate findings on this claim. Hightower v. State, 189 Ga. App. 553 (376 SE2d 717) (1988).
Case remanded with direction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
378 S.E.2d 416, 190 Ga. App. 244, 1989 Ga. App. LEXIS 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seabolt-v-state-gactapp-1989.