Seaboard Finance Co. v. City of Decatur

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Seaboard Finance Co. v. City of Decatur

166 S.E.2d 638, 119 Ga. App. 223, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 1052

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 20, 1969

Docket44280

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 166 S.E.2d 638 (Seaboard Finance Co. v. City of Decatur) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seaboard Finance Co. v. City of Decatur, 166 S.E.2d 638, 119 Ga. App. 223, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 1052 (Ga. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Felton, Chief Judge.

Where the answer of the city official upon whom the summons of garnishment for the wages of a city employee had been served, under Ga. L. 1945, p. 438 (Code Ann. Ch. 46-8), specifically stated that said official did not give her assent and consent to said garnishment proceedings or judgment thereon, and where the traverse to the garnishee’s answer contained the same statement, no valid judgment, default or otherwise, could be rendered against the garnishee city. Ga. L. 1945, pp. 438, 440 (Code Ann. § 46-805); Redwine v. Morgan, 88 Ga. App. 625 (77 SE2d 330); Troup County Bd. of Commissioners v. Public Finance Corp., 109 Ga. App. 547 (1) (136 SE2d 509). Since the sums sought to be garnished could not be condemned without the garnishee’s consent, there was no necessity or requirement for them to be paid into court. Therefore, the court did not err in its order dismissing the traverse to the garnishee’s answer.

Judgment affirmed.

Argued February 3, 1969 Decided February 20, 1969. Murray C. Underwood, for appellant. Thomas 0. Davis, for appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Felton, Chief Judge.

Where the answer of the city official upon whom the summons of garnishment for the wages of a city employee had been served, under Ga. L. 1945, p. 438 (Code Ann. Ch. 46-8), specifically stated that said official did not give her assent and consent to said garnishment proceedings or judgment thereon, and where the traverse to the garnishee’s answer contained the same statement, no valid judgment, default or otherwise, could be rendered against the garnishee city. Ga. L. 1945, pp. 438, 440 (Code Ann. § 46-805); Redwine v. Morgan, 88 Ga. App. 625 (77 SE2d 330); Troup County Bd. of Commissioners v. Public Finance Corp., 109 Ga. App. 547 (1) (136 SE2d 509). Since the sums sought to be garnished could not be condemned without the garnishee’s consent, there was no necessity or requirement for them to be paid into court. Therefore, the court did not err in its order dismissing the traverse to the garnishee’s answer.

Judgment affirmed.

Argued February 3, 1969 Decided February 20, 1969. Murray C. Underwood, for appellant. Thomas 0. Davis, for appellees.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 S.E.2d 638, 119 Ga. App. 223, 1969 Ga. App. LEXIS 1052, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seaboard-finance-co-v-city-of-decatur-gactapp-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack