Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Continental Trust Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia

Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Continental Trust Co.

166 F. 597, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 5461

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia

DecidedAugust 3, 1908

StatusPublished

Cited by11 cases

This text of 166 F. 597 (Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Continental Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seaboard Air Line Ry. v. Continental Trust Co., 166 F. 597, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 5461 (circtndga 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

PARDEE, Circuit Judge.

This cause came on to be further heard upon the interventions of Brown & Randolph, Cobb & Erwin, Goet-chius & Chappell, Tom Eason, Crovatt & Whitfield, E. A. Hawkins, J. B. Geoger, Janes & Hutchens, Neel & Peeples, Thomas F. Walsh, jr., and G. R. Hutchens, and upon the master’s reports thereon and the exceptions thereto, whereupon it is considered that the exceptions are not well taken and are overruled. It is thereupon ordered that the said exceptions be and they are overruled, and the master’s reports he and they are in all respects confirmed; and, it appearing that the services for which the interveners claim the compensation allowed by the master were within the terms and meaning of the order appointing receivers in this cause and entitled to be paid under the said order, it is further ordered that the receivers do pay the amounts, with interest, as allowed and approved in the master’s reports.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PARDEE, Circuit Judge.

This cause came on to be further heard upon the interventions of Brown & Randolph, Cobb & Erwin, Goet-chius & Chappell, Tom Eason, Crovatt & Whitfield, E. A. Hawkins, J. B. Geoger, Janes & Hutchens, Neel & Peeples, Thomas F. Walsh, jr., and G. R. Hutchens, and upon the master’s reports thereon and the exceptions thereto, whereupon it is considered that the exceptions are not well taken and are overruled. It is thereupon ordered that the said exceptions be and they are overruled, and the master’s reports he and they are in all respects confirmed; and, it appearing that the services for which the interveners claim the compensation allowed by the master were within the terms and meaning of the order appointing receivers in this cause and entitled to be paid under the said order, it is further ordered that the receivers do pay the amounts, with interest, as allowed and approved in the master’s reports.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 F. 597, 1908 U.S. App. LEXIS 5461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seaboard-air-line-ry-v-continental-trust-co-circtndga-1908.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack