Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Savage
This text of 109 So. 620 (Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Savage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The evidence may have been without conflict as to the interest of the witnesses Florida and Ramsey in this or like causes which would affect the credibility of their testimony, and appellant may have been entitled to the charge (7) which the court refused (to which proposition appellant cites Bynon v. State, 117 Ala. 80, 23 So. 640, 67 Am. St. Rep. 163, and other cases), still the inquiry thus proposed would involve this court in the examination of a question of fact, as this court has held on sevei'al occasions (Ex parte Steverson, 177 Ala. 384, 58 So. 992, and cases there cited), and will not be indulged on applications for certiorari to the Court of Aqxpeals. Postal Tel. Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 So. 91. Without, therefore, deciding anything as to the question raised against the opinion of the Court of Appeals, the petition is denied.
Writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
109 So. 620, 108 So. 620, 214 Ala. 639, 1926 Ala. LEXIS 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seaboard-air-line-ry-co-v-savage-ala-1926.