Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Moore

193 F. 1022, 113 C.C.A. 668, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1123
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided February 27, 1912·No. No. 2,221·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The constitutionality and applicability of the act of Congress relating to the liability of common carriers by railroad to their employes, approved April 22, 1908 (35 Stat. pt. 1, p. 65, c. 149 [U. S. Comp. St. Supp. 1909, p. 1171]), have been passed upon in a recent decision of the Supreme Court in Mondou v. New York, N. H. & Hartford R. R. Co., 223 U. S. 1, 32 Sup. Ct. 169, 56 L. Ed.-, handed down January 15, 1012, not yqt officially reported. According to this decision, the fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth,"' ninth, and fifteenth assignments of error herein are clearly not sustainable. From an examination of the transcript and briefs, the assignments of error concerning other matters are not well taken. The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Moore, 193 F. 1022, 113 C.C.A. 668, 1912 U.S. App. LEXIS 1123 (5th Cir. 1912).

193 F. 1022 (Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seaboard Coast Line Railroad v. McKelvey
259 So. 2d 777 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)
Schopp v. Muller Dairies, Inc.
25 F. Supp. 50 (E.D. New York, 1938)
White's Admrx. v. Central Vermont Railway Co.
89 A. 618 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1914)