Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. Olsen
Opinion
The petition in an action brought by a passenger against a rail way company for personal injuries alleged, as an act of negligence on the part of the company causing the plaintiff’s injuries, that the platform, upon which plaintiff attempted to alight from the car, “was . . located too far from the step of the . . coach from which she alighted,” and that, “the distance from the car step to the platform was more than an ordinary step for an individual making an average step.” Held, that as [613]*613such allegations were mere conclusions of the plaintiff, a special 'demurrer thereto, calling for a more specific statement of the distance between the platform and the car step, should have been sustained, in the absence of a proper amendment. Blackslone v. Railway Co., 105 Ga. 380.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
51 S.E. 591 (Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. Olsen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.