Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. Moseley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. Moseley

85 S.E. 1021, 144 Ga. 35, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 32

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided August 13, 1915·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Beck, J.

1. The exceptions to the refusal of certain requests to charge the jury are not well taken, because the requests in themselves are not such complete and accurate statements of the law in all respects as to' render it error for the judge to decline to give them.

2. The exceptions to the charge as given and to rulings of the court made pending the trial are without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beck, J.

1. The exceptions to the refusal of certain requests to charge the jury are not well taken, because the requests in themselves are not such complete and accurate statements of the law in all respects as to' render it error for the judge to decline to give them.

2. The exceptions to the charge as given and to rulings of the court made pending the trial are without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. Moseley, 85 S.E. 1021, 144 Ga. 35, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 32 (Ga. 1915).

Pincite

85 S.E. 1021 (Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. Moseley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related