Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. Harris
This text of 49 S.E. 703 (Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Where a traveling salesman, whose compensation is based on commissions on such orders, secured, by him, as his employer approves, shipped his trunks of samples over the line of a common carrier, and they were unreasonably delayed, he can not, in a suit for breach of the contract [708]*708to convey, recover as damages for such delay the profits from orders which, tested by past experience, he would have secured during the period he was without his trunks. Such damages are too remote and speculative, grow out of an enterprise collateral to the contract to ship the trunks, and are not such as the parties contemplated, when- the contract was made, as the natural result of its breach. Civil Code, § 3798; Georgia Railroad v. Hayden, 71 Ga. 518. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 S.E. 703, 121 Ga. 707, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 48, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seaboard-air-line-railway-v-harris-ga-1905.