Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. Canup

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. Canup

60 S.E. 358, 3 Ga. App. 766, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 427

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 24, 1908

Docket923

StatusPublished

This text of 60 S.E. 358 (Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. Canup) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seaboard Air-Line Railway v. Canup, 60 S.E. 358, 3 Ga. App. 766, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 427 (Ga. Ct. App. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

Powell, J.

Though the evidence for the railway company, tending to overcome the presumption of negligence, was very strong, and the evidence to the contrary was very slight, still an inference of negligence by the jury was not wholly unwarranted. The jury having found for the plaintiff, and the judge of the superior, court, on review of the testimony on certiorari, having given his sanction to the verdict, this court will not disturb it. .Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Powell, J.

Though the evidence for the railway company, tending to overcome the presumption of negligence, was very strong, and the evidence to the contrary was very slight, still an inference of negligence by the jury was not wholly unwarranted. The jury having found for the plaintiff, and the judge of the superior, court, on review of the testimony on certiorari, having given his sanction to the verdict, this court will not disturb it. .Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 S.E. 358, 3 Ga. App. 766, 1908 Ga. App. LEXIS 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seaboard-air-line-railway-v-canup-gactapp-1908.