Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Bennett
This text of 47 Fla. 215 (Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Bennett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— This cause came on to be finally heard upon the transcript of the record and briefs for the respective parties, and the court having duly considered same, and it appearing from an inspection of the transcript that no final judgment is exhibited in and by the record proper, it is therefore considered by the court that the writ of error herein taken be and the same is dismissed at the cost of plaintiff in error. Tunno v. International Ry. & Steamship Co., 34 Fla. 300, 16 South. Rep. 180.
Carter, P. J., and Maxwell and Cockrell, JJ., concur.
Taylor, C. J., and Hocicer and Shackleford, JJ., concur in the opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
47 Fla. 215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seaboard-air-line-railway-v-bennett-fla-1904.