Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. Harmon

126 So. 493, 99 Fla. 390, 1930 Fla. LEXIS 1471
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 27, 1930·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment rendered for the defendant in error' herein is reversed on authority of Tampa & Gulf *391 Coast R. Co. v. Lynch, 91 Fla. 375, 108 So. R. 560; Southern Ry. Co. v. Mann, 91 Fla. 948, 108 So. R. 889; Germak v. Fla. E. C. Ry., 95 Fla. 991, 117 So. R. 391; S. A. L. Ry. v. Myrick, 91 Fla. 918, 109 So. R. 193; Fla. E. C. Ry. v. Davis, 96 Fla. 171, 117 So. R. 841; W. & A. Ry. v. Henderson, 279 U. S. 639, 73 L. Ed. 884.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Strum and Buford, J. J., concur. Terrell, C. J., and Ellis and Brown, J. J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. Harmon, 126 So. 493, 99 Fla. 390, 1930 Fla. LEXIS 1471 (Fla. 1930).

126 So. 493 (Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. Harmon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Atlantic Coast Line R. R. Co. v. Mish
128 So. 839 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)