Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. Florida Citrus Exchange

Supreme Court of Florida

Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. Florida Citrus Exchange

103 So. 607, 89 Fla. 112

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 14, 1925·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Upon a full consideration it appears that the evidence herein, taken as an entir.ety, does not fairly sustain the amount of damages awarded by the judgment; •therefore a new trial should be granted, a remittitur not "being deemed appropriate.

Eeversed.

*113 Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur. Taylor, C. J., and Ellis and Browne, J. J., concur in the opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Upon a full consideration it appears that the evidence herein, taken as an entir.ety, does not fairly sustain the amount of damages awarded by the judgment; •therefore a new trial should be granted, a remittitur not "being deemed appropriate.

Eeversed.

*113 Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur. Taylor, C. J., and Ellis and Browne, J. J., concur in the opinion.

Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. Florida Citrus Exchange, 103 So. 607, 89 Fla. 112 (Fla. 1925).

Pincite

103 So. 607 (Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. Florida Citrus Exchange) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.