Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. Feingold

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. Feingold

134 S.E. 327, 35 Ga. App. 496, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 941

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 15, 1926

Docket17314

StatusPublished

This text of 134 S.E. 327 (Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. Feingold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. Feingold, 134 S.E. 327, 35 Ga. App. 496, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 941 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Bboyi.es, C. J.

1. The charge of the court in this case was fair and sufficiently full, and the refusal to charge as requested was not error.

2. The excerpt from the charge complained of, when considered in connection with the entire charge, was not error.

3. This court can not hold, as a matter of law, that there was no evidence authorizing the verdict; and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. James Tift Mann, B. S. Roddenbery Jr., for plaintiff in error. Milner & FarJcas, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI