Sea v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance
154 U.S. 659, 14 S. Ct. 1191, 1880 U.S. LEXIS 1553
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This motion is granted on the authority of Carroll v. Dorsey, 20 How. 204, because of the omission to state with certainty the return day of the writ of error. The Refect is one that is amendable under section 1005 Rev. Stat., but as no application is made by the plaintiff in error for leave to amend, and no citation has ever been served, we are not inclined, on our motion, to make any order in that behalf. Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sea v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance, 154 U.S. 659, 14 S. Ct. 1191, 1880 U.S. LEXIS 1553 (1880).
154 U.S. 659 (Sea v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Horton
233 U.S. 492 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Betts v. Gahagan
205 F. 890 (Fourth Circuit, 1913)