Sea Island Cotton Gin Co. v. Fowler

134 S.E. 203, 35 Ga. App. 588, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1014
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sea Island Cotton Gin Co. v. Fowler. Read the opinion of the Court — 37 Ga. App. 792
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided July 14, 1926·No. 17361·Published

Opinion

Luke, J.

The Sea Island Cotton Gin Co. sued Eowler on two promissory notes for $120 each, given for the balance due on the purchase-price of a cotton gin. The defendant pleaded total failure of consideration, and sought the return of the cash payment made on said gin. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant. Upon the authority of Hardee v. Carter, 94 Ga. 482 (19 S. E. 715), and Stimpson Specialty Co. v. Parker, 10 Ga. App. 295 (73 S. E. 412), the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sea Island Cotton Gin Co. v. Fowler, 134 S.E. 203, 35 Ga. App. 588, 1926 Ga. App. LEXIS 1014 (Ga. Ct. App. 1926).

134 S.E. 203 (Sea Island Cotton Gin Co. v. Fowler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hardee v. Carter
19 S.E. 715 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1894)
Stimpson Specialty Co. v. Parker
73 S.E. 412 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1912)