SEA

19 I. & N. Dec. 817
CourtBoard of Immigration Appeals
DecidedJuly 1, 1988
DocketID 3089
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 19 I. & N. Dec. 817 (SEA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Board of Immigration Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
SEA, 19 I. & N. Dec. 817 (bia 1988).

Opinion

Interim Decision #8089

MATTER OF SEA, INC.

In Visa Petition Proceedings

LIN 88 147 0105

Decided by Commissioner um November 10, 1988

(1) Substantial academic course work in a professional field combined with profes- sional experience and achievement may be considered equivalent to a bachelor's degree. (2) Ordinary experience alone cannot be equated with a college degree. (3) Experience which is substituted for education mast include the theoretical and practical application of specialized knowledge required at the professional level of the occupation. It cannot be concluded that any on-the-job experience related to a professional activity may bo substituted for academic education.

ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER: Gregory R. McCall Perkins Coie 1201 Third Avenue, 40th Floor Seattle, Washington 98101-3099

This is an appeal from the adverse decision of the director, Northern Regional Service Center. The appeal will be sustained. The petitioner, which has 50 employees, indicates it is a wholly owned subsidiary of Datamarine International, Inc., a designer and manufacturer of marine navigation equipment. The petitioner de- signs, manufactures, and markets marine radio communications equipment. It seeks to classify the beneficiary, a native and citizen of Denmark, as a nonimmigrant of distinguished merit and ability pursuant to section 101(a)(15)(H)(i) of the Immigration and Nation- ality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(15)(11)(i) (1982), based on its intent to employ him as an electrical design engineer. The director determined that the petitioner had failed to estab- lish that the proposed position is within the professions or requires a person of distinguished merit and ability. The director also found that the petitioner had failed to establish that the beneficiary has at least a bachelor's degree or its equivalent or that he is preemi- nent in his field of endeavor. On appeal, counsel asserts that the proposed position requires a professionally qualified person. Counsel also asserts that the benefi- Interim Decision #3089

ciary has the equivalent of a bachelor's degree in engineering tech- nology. Both of counsel's assertions are supported by the record. Distinguished merit and ability may be established in two ways. One way is to demonstrate that a beneficiary is a member of the professions within the meaning of section 101(a)(32) of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(32) (1982). Matter of General Atomic Company, 17 I&N Dec. 532 (Comm. 1980); Matter of Essex Cryogenics Industries, Inc., 14 I&N Dec. 196 (D.A.C. 1972). Another way is to show that the beneficiary is a person of prominence, renown, or preeminence in his or her field of endeavor. Matter of Shaw, 11 I&N Dec. 277 (D.D. 1965); H.R. Rep. No. 851, 91st Cong., 2d Sess., reprinted in 1970 U.S. Code Cong. & Ad. News 2750, 2752-53. Since no representations have been made that the beneficiary is preeminent or that the job in question requires preeminence, con- sideration will be limited to the issues relating to professional standing.

PROFESSIONAL POSITION

"Profession," as defined by section 101(a)(32) of the Act, contem- plates knowledge or learning, not merely skill, of an advanced type in a given field gained by a prolonged course of specialized instruc- tion and study of at least baccalaureate level, which is a realistic prerequisite to entry into the particular field of endeavor. Matter of Ling, 13 I&N Dec. 35 (R.C. 1968); Matter of Shin, 11 I&N Dec. 686 (D.D. 1966). That section of law states "the term 'profession' shall include but not be limited to architects, engineers, lawyers, physicians, surgeons, and teachers in elementary or secondary schools, colleges, academies, or seminaries." The petitioner, "a small U.S. technology-based manufacturing entity," plans to design marine radio communications equipment for the European market. In order to do so, it requires the benefi- ciary's services for a 2-year period to help design marine radio com- munications equipment to meet the European nations' regulations; test prototypes of equipment and prepare the test results for sub- mission to the regulatory bodies of the European countries for ap- proval; and provide technical input to the petitioner's engineering staff. According to counsel, five electrical engineers with bachelor's degrees will assist the beneficiary in designing and developing the necessary marine radio communications equipment. The petitioner states that it has purchased a facility in Denmark which it will use to test, develop, and market equipment it will design at its United States facility. After completion of the design and prototype testing phase of the project, the beneficiary will ap- 818 Interim Decision #3089

parently be transferred to the E -uropean subsidiary of the petition- er's parent company Datamarine "to establish a technical and type acceptance facility at Datamarine's recently purchased European plant." In support of the appeal, counsel submits a copy of an advertise- ment in Danish for the proposed position which he states was placed in Dan -Nil trade journals. The advertisement states that the applicant must be a "graduated electrical engineer" or have "equivalent technical background" and must have 3 to 5 years of experience in the development and design of HF/SSB marine radios. Counsel asserts that the duties of the proposed position as de- scribed by the petitioner match the descriptions given in the De- partment of Labor's Dictionary of Occupational Titles (4th ed. 1977) for the occupation of electronics or electrical design engineer. Ex- amination of this publication reflects the proposed duties are, in fact, similar to those of an electronics or electrical design engineer. The Occupational Outlook Handbook (1.988-89) indicates on page 52 that a bachelor's degree in engineering is a realistic prerequisite for engineering positions. Furaielmore, as noted previously, when Congress defined the term "profession" by example in section 101(a)(32) of the Act, it specifically listed engineers as within the professions. Accordingly, it is concluded the position offered the beneficiary is a professional one which normally requires at least a baccalaureate-level degree in electrical engineering.

WORK EXPERIENCE EQUIVALENT TO A DEGREE The beneficiary in this proceeding has not completed formal bac- calaureate-level education, but counsel asserts that he has the equivalent of a bachelor's degree in engineering technology. Coun- sel correctly notes that case law accommodates those instances where persons are recognized as members of .the professions with- out the normally required academic degrees. See Matter of Yaakov, 13 I&N Dec. 203 (R.C. 1969); Matter of Arjani, 12 I&N Dec. 649 (RC. 1967); Matter of Bienkowski, 12 I&N Dec. 17 (D.D. 1966); Matter of Devnani, 11 I&N Dec. 800 (Acting D.D. 1966). However, it should be noted that there are no published Service decisions where a person with nn formal college-level education has been rec- ognized as a member of the professions. The beneficiaries in the four cited cases all had formal college- level academic education, specialized training in their subject areas, and many years of responsible experience in their fields. Interim Decision #3089

Moreover, all four beneficiaries had attained professional standing and recognition. Experience which is substituted for a portion of education must include the theoretical and practical application of specialized knowledge required at the professional level of the occupation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chung Song Ja Corp. v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services
96 F. Supp. 3d 1191 (W.D. Washington, 2015)
Caremax Inc v. Holder
40 F. Supp. 3d 1182 (N.D. California, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 I. & N. Dec. 817, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sea-bia-1988.