Se-Kure Controls, Inc. v. Diam USA, Inc.

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
• Decided: May 5, 2010
• Docket: 10-1052
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2010-1052

SE-KURE CONTROLS, INC.,

Plaintiff/Cross Claim Defendant- Appellant,

v.

DIAM USA, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee, and

POP DISPLAYS USA, LLC (successor in interest to Diam USA, Inc.),

Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee, and

POP DISPLAYS, LLC, POP DISPLAYS, INC., and DIAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Defendants,

TELEFONIX, INC.,

Cross Claim Plaintiff/Third Party Defendant-Appellee.

Richard D. Harris, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff/cross claim defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Herbert H. Finn, Kevin J. O’Shea, and Cameron M. Nelson.

Lee F. Grossman, Niro, Scavone, Haller & Niro, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for all appellees. With him on the brief was Mark M. Grossman, Grossman Law Offices, of Arlington, Illinois.

Appealed from: United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Judge Ronald A. Guzman NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2010-1052

Plaintiff/Cross Claim Defendant- Appellant, v.

Defendant-Appellee,

and

POP DISPLAYS USA, LLC (successor in interest to Diam USA, Inc.),

Third Party Plaintiff-Appellee,

POP DISPLAYS, LLC, POP DISPLAYS, INC., and DIAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.,

Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

In CASE NO(S). 06-CV-4857. This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (RADER, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED May 5, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly_________________________ Jan Horbaly, Clerk