S&E Contractors, Inc. v. City of Tampa

629 So. 2d 883, 1993 WL 461974
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedNovember 10, 1993
Docket92-04384
StatusPublished
Cited by46 cases

This text of 629 So. 2d 883 (S&E Contractors, Inc. v. City of Tampa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
S&E Contractors, Inc. v. City of Tampa, 629 So. 2d 883, 1993 WL 461974 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

629 So.2d 883 (1993)

S & E CONTRACTORS, Inc., as assignee of the rights of Hillsborough County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Appellant/Cross-Appellee,
v.
CITY OF TAMPA, a municipal corporation of the State of Florida, Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

No. 92-04384.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 10, 1993.
Rehearing Denied January 12, 1994.

Mary M. Piccard of Cummings, Lawrence & Vezina, P.A., Tallahassee, for appellant.

Leo H. Meirose, Jr. of Allen & Meirose, P.A., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant/cross-appellee, S & E Contractors, Inc. (S & E), asserts in this appeal that the trial court erred in failing to award S & E attorney's fees. Appellee/cross-appellant, City of Tampa (City), cross-appeals the award of costs and prejudgment interest to S & E. We find no error in the appeal or cross-appeal except that the final judgment awarded S & E post-judgment interest on all sums found due in the final judgment, including the prejudgment interest award. It is error to award interest on interest and, accordingly, we reverse only that part of the final judgment which awards postjudgment interest on the amount found due as prejudgment interest. See Cent. Constructors, Inc. v. Spectrum Contracting Co., 621 So.2d 526 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).

FRANK, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

OTTO HANS VAN MAERSSEN v. DIANA GERDTS
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2020
Goldman v. Goldman
182 So. 3d 722 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
JAMES S. WINDER, Former Husband v. Dian A. Winder, Former Wife
152 So. 3d 836 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Motie v. Motie
132 So. 3d 1210 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Lopez v. Lopez
135 So. 3d 326 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Valentine v. Van Sickle
42 So. 3d 267 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Sheth v. Sheth
26 So. 3d 633 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Fashingbauer v. Fashingbauer
19 So. 3d 401 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Parks v. Parks
18 So. 3d 1072 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Roth v. Roth
973 So. 2d 580 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
Woellmer v. Woellmer
935 So. 2d 610 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Stough v. Stough
933 So. 2d 603 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Mobley v. Mobley
920 So. 2d 97 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Grieco v. Grieco
917 So. 2d 1052 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Levy v. Levy
900 So. 2d 737 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Konsoulas v. Konsoulas
904 So. 2d 440 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Karimi v. Karimi
867 So. 2d 471 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
Lamont v. Lamont
851 So. 2d 898 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Bush v. Bush
824 So. 2d 293 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Young v. Young
816 So. 2d 799 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
629 So. 2d 883, 1993 WL 461974, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/se-contractors-inc-v-city-of-tampa-fladistctapp-1993.