Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/S.D. v. State

S.D. v. State

627 So. 2d 613, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12367, 1993 WL 517223
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in S.D. v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12124 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 14, 1993·No. No. 93-33·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In accordance with the appellee’s appropriate concession, the adjudicatory order below shall be amended to reflect the trial judge’s oral pronouncement that the respondent was guilty of petit theft rather than grand theft as the order now erroneously states.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

S.D. v. State, 627 So. 2d 613, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 12367, 1993 WL 517223 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

627 So. 2d 613 (S.D. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.