S.D. v. Florida Department of Children & Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida

S.D. v. Florida Department of Children & Families

134 So. 3d 998, 2012 WL 1849665, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8027

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 22, 2012

DocketNo. 1D11-6948

StatusPublished

This text of 134 So. 3d 998 (S.D. v. Florida Department of Children & Families) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

S.D. v. Florida Department of Children & Families, 134 So. 3d 998, 2012 WL 1849665, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8027 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The mother, S.D., appeals an order terminating her parental rights to three of her children, S.S., E.S., and D.H. The mother does not appeal the termination of her parental rights to S.S. But she does appeal the termination of her parental rights to E.S. and D.H., asserting that the trial court’s order is not supported by competent, substantial evidence. Upon the proper concessions of error by the Department of Children and Families and the Guardian ad Litem Program, we reverse the order terminating the mother’s parental rights to E.S. and D.H. and remand the case for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The mother, S.D., appeals an order terminating her parental rights to three of her children, S.S., E.S., and D.H. The mother does not appeal the termination of her parental rights to S.S. But she does appeal the termination of her parental rights to E.S. and D.H., asserting that the trial court’s order is not supported by competent, substantial evidence. Upon the proper concessions of error by the Department of Children and Families and the Guardian ad Litem Program, we reverse the order terminating the mother’s parental rights to E.S. and D.H. and remand the case for further proceedings.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 So. 3d 998, 2012 WL 1849665, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 8027, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sd-v-florida-department-of-children-families-fladistctapp-2012.