S.D. v. C.A.T.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

S.D. v. C.A.T.

761 So. 2d 1242, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8730, 2000 WL 953544

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 12, 2000

DocketNo. 2D99-1543

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 761 So. 2d 1242 (S.D. v. C.A.T.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

S.D. v. C.A.T., 761 So. 2d 1242, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8730, 2000 WL 953544 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this paternity action, S.D. challenges the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the mother, C.A.T. In his brief, S.D. argued that summary judgment was improper because disputed issues of material fact existed concerning whether he was, in fact, the biological father of the child. We now have the results of DNA testing, which establish that the probability that S.D. is the biological father of the child is 99.9999 percent.¹ Therefore, we affirm the summary judgment in favor of C.A.T. Our opinion on this issue renders S.D.’s remaining challenges to the trial court’s orders moot.

Affirmed.

PARKER, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this paternity action, S.D. challenges the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the mother, C.A.T. In his brief, S.D. argued that summary judgment was improper because disputed issues of material fact existed concerning whether he was, in fact, the biological father of the child. We now have the results of DNA testing, which establish that the probability that S.D. is the biological father of the child is 99.9999 percent.¹ Therefore, we affirm the summary judgment in favor of C.A.T. Our opinion on this issue renders S.D.’s remaining challenges to the trial court’s orders moot.

Affirmed.

PARKER, A.C.J., and WHATLEY and SALCINES, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

761 So. 2d 1242, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8730, 2000 WL 953544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sd-v-cat-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack