Scwyana Smith v. Ankus, L.L.C.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 28, 2022
Docket14-21-00468-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Scwyana Smith v. Ankus, L.L.C. (Scwyana Smith v. Ankus, L.L.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scwyana Smith v. Ankus, L.L.C., (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Motion denied; Order filed April 28, 2022

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-21-00468-CV ____________

SCWYANA SMITH, Appellant

V.

ANKUS, L.L.C., Appellee

On Appeal from the 113th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018-52368

ABATEMENT ORDER

No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. Appellant is proceeding without payment of costs. See Tex. R. Civ. P. 145. The clerk’s record does not reflect that appellant filed a request for a court reporter’s record. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.6 (b). On April 14, 2022, the court reporter provided this court with an uncertified copy of a document filed by appellant requesting the portions of the record. Also on April 14, 2022, appellant filed an “emergency motion” requesting various forms of relief, including that the reporter produce all records from the below hearing. That motion is denied. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 145(i), when a declarant is proceeding without payment of costs, “the court must designate the portions to be transcribed.” Tex. R. Civ. P. 145(i). Accordingly, the trial court is directed to conduct a hearing, with 10 days’ notice to the parties and the court reporter, to determine what portions of the record are to be transcribed by the court reporter.

The court is directed to reduce its findings to writing and the trial-court clerk is directed to prepare, certify, and file a supplemental clerk’s record containing those findings filed with the clerk of this court, together with a reporter’s record from the hearing, within 30 days of the date of this order. See Tex. R. App. P. 34.6(e)(3).

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party, or the court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. It is the responsibility of any party seeking reinstatement to request a hearing date from the trial court and to schedule a hearing in compliance with this court’s order. If the parties do not request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date and notify the parties of such date.

PER CURIAM

Panel Consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Bourliot and Spain.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Scwyana Smith v. Ankus, L.L.C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scwyana-smith-v-ankus-llc-texapp-2022.