Scurlock-Ferguson v. City of Durham
178 L. Ed. 2d 555, 131 S. Ct. 850, 562 U.S. 1107, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 9678, 79 U.S.L.W. 3359
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Scurlock-Ferguson v. City of Durham. Read the opinion of the Court — 179 L. Ed. 2d 504 →
Opinion
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris denied. Petitioner is allowed until January 3, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Same case below, 381 Fed. Appx. 302.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scurlock-Ferguson v. City of Durham, 178 L. Ed. 2d 555, 131 S. Ct. 850, 562 U.S. 1107, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 9678, 79 U.S.L.W. 3359 (U.S. 2010).
178 L. Ed. 2d 555 (Scurlock-Ferguson v. City of Durham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Scurlock-Ferguson v. City of Durham
381 F. App'x 302 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)