Scurlock-Ferguson v. City of Durham
178 L. Ed. 2d 555, 131 S. Ct. 850, 562 U.S. 1107, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 9678, 79 U.S.L.W. 3359
This text of 178 L. Ed. 2d 555 (Scurlock-Ferguson v. City of Durham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Scurlock-Ferguson v. City of Durham, 178 L. Ed. 2d 555, 131 S. Ct. 850, 562 U.S. 1107, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 9678, 79 U.S.L.W. 3359 (U.S. 2010).
Opinion
Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pau-peris denied. Petitioner is allowed until January 3, 2011, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
Same case below, 381 Fed. Appx. 302.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Scurlock-Ferguson v. City of Durham
381 F. App'x 302 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
178 L. Ed. 2d 555, 131 S. Ct. 850, 562 U.S. 1107, 2010 U.S. LEXIS 9678, 79 U.S.L.W. 3359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scurlock-ferguson-v-city-of-durham-scotus-2010.