Home/California Court of Appeal/Scully v. Rosanoff

Scully v. Rosanoff

104 P.2d 706, 40 Cal. App. 2d 249, 1940 Cal. App. LEXIS 98
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedJuly 23, 1940
DocketCiv. No. 12741
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 104 P.2d 706 (Scully v. Rosanoff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scully v. Rosanoff, 104 P.2d 706, 40 Cal. App. 2d 249, 1940 Cal. App. LEXIS 98 (Cal. Ct. App. 1940).

Opinion

THE COURT.

The respondents having served and filed their motion to dismiss the appeal in the above-entitled matter, supported by a certificate of the clerk of the superior court setting forth the facts required by rule VI of this court, and it appearing that more than five months have elapsed since the filing of the notice of appeal, and it appearing that the notice of appeal was filed on the 29th day of December, 1939, and that no notice to prepare the clerk’s transcript has been filed, and that no transcript has been filed,

It is hereby ordered that this appeal be, and it hereby is, dismissed.1.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Levin v. Levin
148 P.2d 714 (California Court of Appeal, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 P.2d 706, 40 Cal. App. 2d 249, 1940 Cal. App. LEXIS 98, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scully-v-rosanoff-calctapp-1940.