Scully v. Lomenzo

219 N.E.2d 192, 18 N.Y.2d 595, 272 N.Y.S.2d 370, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1192
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 7, 1966
StatusPublished

This text of 219 N.E.2d 192 (Scully v. Lomenzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scully v. Lomenzo, 219 N.E.2d 192, 18 N.Y.2d 595, 272 N.Y.S.2d 370, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1192 (N.Y. 1966).

Opinion

Order reversed, without costs, on the dissenting opinion at the Appellate Division and matter remitted to Special Term to make provision for a Special Primary Election. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Van Voorhis, Scileppi, Bergan and Keating. Judges Ftjld and Burke dissent and vote to affirm on the majority opinion at the Appellate Division.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 N.E.2d 192, 18 N.Y.2d 595, 272 N.Y.S.2d 370, 1966 N.Y. LEXIS 1192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scully-v-lomenzo-ny-1966.