Scull's Estate

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Scull's Estate

52 Pa. Super. 87, 1912 Pa. Super. LEXIS 134

Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided November 18, 1912·No. Appeal, No. 104·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The question involved in this case is not free from difficulty, and we find after full consideration that the six judges who heard the appeal are equally divided in opinion. The respective views with regard to the question are well set forth in the opinions of the auditing judge, of the majority of the court on exceptions to his adjudication, and the dissenting opinion. The six judges who heard the appeal being equally divided in opinion, the decree is affirmed, costs to be paid by the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

The question involved in this case is not free from difficulty, and we find after full consideration that the six judges who heard the appeal are equally divided in opinion. The respective views with regard to the question are well set forth in the opinions of the auditing judge, of the majority of the court on exceptions to his adjudication, and the dissenting opinion. The six judges who heard the appeal being equally divided in opinion, the decree is affirmed, costs to be paid by the appellant.

Scull's Estate, 52 Pa. Super. 87, 1912 Pa. Super. LEXIS 134 (Pa. Ct. App. 1912).

Pincite

52 Pa. Super. 87 (Scull's Estate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related