Scuderi v. Frost
This text of 281 A.D.2d 468 (Scuderi v. Frost) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for dental malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Hall, J.), entered December 14, 1999, which, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendant and against him dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiffs motion to preclude testimony of the defendant’s expert witness (see, People v Santana, 80 NY2d 92, 100).
[469]*469The plaintiffs remaining contention is without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
281 A.D.2d 468, 721 N.Y.S.2d 564, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scuderi-v-frost-nyappdiv-2001.