Scudder v. Pierce
This text of Scudder v. Pierce (Scudder v. Pierce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-29483 23-JAN-2014 10:37 AM
SCWC-29483
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I _________________________________________________________________
GALE SCUDDER,
Respondent/Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant,
vs.
FRANK PIERCE, III; NANCY STEINECKE;
and E KOMO MAI SPORT HORSES, LLC,
Petitioners/Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellees,
and
DAVID W. LACY; LACY and JACKSON, LLLC, et al., Defendants
_______________________________________________________________
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(ICA NO. 29483; CIV. NO. 06-1-0187)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.,
and Circuit Judge Nishimura, in place of Acoba, J., recused)
Petitioners/Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellees Frank
Pierce, III; Nancy Steinecke; and E Komo Mai Sport Horses, LLC’s
Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on December 30, 2013,
is hereby rejected.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, January 23, 2014.
Robert D. S. Kim /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
for petitioners
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama
William J. Rosdil and
Peter Van Name Esser /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
for respondents
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Rhonda A. Nishimura
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Scudder v. Pierce, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scudder-v-pierce-haw-2014.