Scudder v. Pierce
This text of Scudder v. Pierce (Scudder v. Pierce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-29483 17-DEC-2013 10:27 AM SCWC-29483
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII ________________________________________________________________
GALE SCUDDER, Petitioner/Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant,
vs.
FRANK PIERCE, III; NANCY STEINECKE;
and E KOMO MAI SPORT HORSES, LLC,
Respondents/Defendants/Counterclaimants-Appellees,
and
DAVID W. LACY; LACY and JACKSON, LLLC, et al., Defendants
_______________________________________________________________
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (ICA NO. 29483; CIV. NO. 06-1-0187)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna and Pollack, JJ.)
Petitioner/Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant Gale Scudder’s Application for Writ of Certiorari, filed on November 9, 2013, is hereby rejected. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, December 17, 2013.
William J. Rosdil and /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald Peter Van Name Esser for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
Robert D. S. Kim /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. for respondents /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Scudder v. Pierce, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scudder-v-pierce-haw-2013.