Scudder v. Davis

33 Me. 575
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1852
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 33 Me. 575 (Scudder v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scudder v. Davis, 33 Me. 575 (Me. 1852).

Opinion

Howard, J., orally.

— The case is submitted for judgment as the rights of the parties may require. A consideration of the pleadings is therefore unnecessary. The evidence shows that the trustees have their established and usual place of business in the county of Lincoln, and there held their last annual meeting, and for several of the last years have usually held their meetings there.

The statute ch. 119, <§> 5, is imperative that, upon such facts the action should be brought in that county alone.

The plaintiffs however have contended that this provision of the statute was for the benefit of the trustees only, and may therefore be waived by them. But the language is unambiguous and clear. We have no choice but to give it effect as it reads.

As the action could not rightfully be commenced for this county, it cannot be maintained here.

Writ abated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Exchange Bank of Mannington v. Beatty
147 S.E. 475 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 Me. 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scudder-v-davis-me-1852.