Scudder v. Bloomfield
3 N.J.L. 950
Opinion
— Here is no judgment for any penalty. It is evident the jury considered the action below, as an action of trespass; for in rendering their verdict they say, we find §8 41 damage; whereas, the action is an action of debt for penalties under the Timber Act.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scudder v. Bloomfield, 3 N.J.L. 950 (N.J. 1812).
3 N.J.L. 950 (Scudder v. Bloomfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.