Scruggs v. Morel

95 S.E. 316, 22 Ga. App. 93, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 162
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 15, 1918
Docket9133
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 95 S.E. 316 (Scruggs v. Morel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Scruggs v. Morel, 95 S.E. 316, 22 Ga. App. 93, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 162 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Wade, C. J..

1. The title to the property not being vested in the decedent at the time of his death, it could not be set aside as a year’s support for his widow and minor children.

2. There was no reversible error in admitting the evidence objected to; nor is there any merit in the remaining special grounds of the motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins and Luke, JJ., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kenner v. Kenner
104 S.E.2d 890 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1958)
Harris v. Mandeville
24 S.E.2d 23 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Plowden v. Plowden
171 S.E. 388 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Martin v. Citizens Bank
152 S.E. 234 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 S.E. 316, 22 Ga. App. 93, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scruggs-v-morel-gactapp-1918.