Scroggs v. Harkness Heights Land Co.

233 P. 831, 76 Colo. 597, 1925 Colo. LEXIS 376
Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided February 2, 1925·No. No. 11,147.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Denison

delivered the opinion of the court.

The defendant in error was plaintiff below and had a decree quieting its title to a lot in Denver. Louise C. Anderson, one of the defendants below, alone assigns error.

Mrs. Anderson claims under one Addis who had an unrecorded contract of purchase from the plaintiff company in whom the title stood of record. Payments were defaulted, and, after thirty days’ notice to all parties, including Mrs. Anderson, to come in and pay, and failure by all to do so, the company took possession.

The claim of plaintiff in error is that she was misled into the purchase of the lot by the conduct of the plaintiff in holding out Addis as the owner, but the evidence is that her son and agent, who conducted the transaction for her, *598 had actual and previous notice of the plaintiff’s title and of the fact that Addis- held only by contract.

Supersedeas denied and judgment affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Allen and Mr. Justice Whitford concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scroggs v. Harkness Heights Land Co., 233 P. 831, 76 Colo. 597, 1925 Colo. LEXIS 376 (Colo. 1925).

233 P. 831 (Scroggs v. Harkness Heights Land Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Terre Grande, Inc. v. Four Corners Oil & Minerals Co.
262 F. Supp. 964 (D. Colorado, 1967)
Rocky Mountain Fuel Co. v. Clayton Coal Co.
134 P.2d 1062 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1943)
American Mortgage Co. v. Logan
7 P.2d 953 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1932)