Scroggins v. Watson

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 18, 2006·No. 05-2128·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-2128

EARL T. SCROGGINS, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THELMA M. WATSON,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-05-974)

Submitted: May 16, 2006 Decided: May 18, 2006

Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Earl T. Scroggins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Earl T. Scroggins, Jr., appeals the district court’s

order dismissing his civil action for lack of jurisdiction. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Scroggins v. Watson, No. CA-05-974 (E.D. Va. Sept. 14,

2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scroggins v. Watson, (4th Cir. 2006).

Scroggins v. Watson (Scroggins v. Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.