Scroggins v. Watson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-2128
EARL T. SCROGGINS, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
THELMA M. WATSON,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-05-974)
Submitted: May 16, 2006 Decided: May 18, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Earl T. Scroggins, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Earl T. Scroggins, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his civil action for lack of jurisdiction. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Scroggins v. Watson, No. CA-05-974 (E.D. Va. Sept. 14,
2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scroggins v. Watson (Scroggins v. Watson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.